Analisis Penerapan Model Open BRR Dalam Pengujian Kualitas Perangkat Lunak Pada Website Company Profile Sneakcrafters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70052/jka.v3i2.749Keywords:
Evaluasi Perangkat Lunak, Company Profile Web, Open BRR, Euclidean Distance, Kualitas AplikasiAbstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi kualitas aplikasi company profile berbasis web sebagai media informasi perusahaan bagi pengguna. Evaluasi menggunakan model Open BRR yang mencakup tujuh indikator: Development Process, Documentation, Operational Software, Support, Software Technology, Functionality, serta Community and Adoption. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan dianalisis dengan metode Euclidean Distance. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa indikator Development Process memperoleh nilai tertinggi sebesar 82%, yang mencerminkan proses pengembangan sistem telah berjalan dengan baik. Disusul oleh Operational Software dengan 81%, serta Support dan Software Technology yang masing-masing mendapat 80%, menunjukkan bahwa aspek operasional, dukungan, dan teknologi sudah cukup andal. Sementara itu, Functionality dan Community and Adoption masing-masing memperoleh 79%, menandakan masih adanya ruang perbaikan pada fitur sistem dan keterlibatan pengguna. Indikator dengan nilai terendah adalah Documentation, yaitu 72%, yang menunjukkan perlunya perbaikan pada dokumentasi agar lebih informatif dan mudah dipahami. Secara keseluruhan, aplikasi ini telah menunjukkan kualitas yang cukup baik, dan evaluasi ini memberikan gambaran objektif serta rekomendasi perbaikan yang dapat dijadikan acuan untuk pengembangan lebih lanjut.
This study was conducted to evaluate the quality of a web-based company profile application that serves as an information medium for users. The evaluation applied the Open BRR quality model, which includes seven indicators: Development Process, Documentation, Operational Software, Support, Software Technology, Functionality, and Community and Adoption. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using the Euclidean Distance method. The results showed that the Development Process indicator scored the highest at 82%, indicating that the system development process is well-managed. This was followed by Operational Software at 81%, and Support and Software Technology at 80% each, suggesting that operational performance, support, and technology implementation are reliable. Meanwhile, Functionality and Community and Adoption scored 79%, implying that there is still room for improvement in system features and user engagement. The lowest score was found in the Documentation indicator, at 72%, highlighting the need for clearer and more comprehensive user documentation. Overall, the application demonstrates a good level of quality, and this evaluation provides an objective overview along with improvement recommendations that can be used for further development.
References
F. Gunawan, Asriyanik, and W. Apriandari, “661-1239-2-PB,” vol. 10, pp. 245–256, Aug. 2021.
E. Petrinja, A. Sillitti, and G. Succi, “Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM assessment models,” in IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2010, pp. 224–238. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18.
A. Arga Pratama and A. B. Mutiara, “Software Quality Analysis for Halodoc Application using ISO 25010:2011.” [Online]. Available: www.ijacsa.thesai.org
D. Aswito, R. Rahmahidayatul, S. A. Wulandari, and R. Purbaningtyas, “Manajemen Kualitas Website Sistem Informasi Desa Berdasarkan Model FURPS Menggunakan Metode Euclidean Distance,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10/25047/jtit.v11i1.348
S. Sharma, K. Panwar, and R. Garg, “Decision Making Approach for Ranking of Software Testing Techniques using Euclidean Distance Based Approach,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), vol. 12, pp. 599–608, 2021, doi: 10.34218/IJARET.12.2.2021.059.
W. Ariyo Bimo, U. Ibn, and K. Bogor, “Penilaian Penggunaan Dompet Digital Saat Pandemi Covid-19,” 2021.
R. Mussabayev, “Optimizing Euclidean Distance Computation,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 23, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3390/math12233787.
A. Oussous, I. Menyani, M. Srifi, A. A. Lahcen, S. Kheraz, and F. Z. Benjelloun, “An Evaluation of Open Source Adaptive Learning Solutions,” Feb. 01, 2023, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/info14020057.
M. Nanja, Y. Lasena, and H. Dalai, “Perancangan Sitem Uji Kebergunaan Aplikasi Berbasis Web Menggunakan System Usability Scale,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi), vol. 6, no. 4, p. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.35870/jti.
M. Hyzy et al., “System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis,” JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, vol. 10, no. 8, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.2196/37290.
Y. Chuan, C. Zhao, Z. He, and L. Wu, “The Success of AdaBoost and Its Application in Portfolio Management,” Mar. 2021, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12345
H. Kai and W. Tang, “Evaluating Software Documentation Quality.”
S. Rochimah, U. Laili Yuhana, and S. Balqis Hidayat, “International Journal On Informatics Visualization journal homepage : www.joiv.org/index.php/joiv International Journal On Informatics Visualization Software Quality Measurement for Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, and Reliability Characteristics Using Analytical Hierarchy Process.” [Online]. Available: www.joiv.org/index.php/joiv
S. Manoharan, S. Jena, and A. Ilavendhan, “1817-Article Text-3406-1-10-20210408,” vol. 12, pp. 4386–4395, Apr. 2021.
A. Ferrari, F. Mazzanti, D. Basile, and M. H. Ter Beek, “Systematic Evaluation and Usability Analysis of Formal Methods Tools for Railway Signaling System Design.” [Online]. Available: http://www.astrail.eu
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Alfinn Eka Prasetya, Adita Rahmat Hidayat, Nabila Sasa Miranda, Reva Rizqia Salsabilla, Rani Purbaningtyas (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
