Semiotic Analysis of Emojis in The Comments Section of Nasdaily’s Instagram

Authors

  • Mochammad Alvin Pratama Putra Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo
  • Dwi Taurina Mila Wardhani Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo
  • Yopi Thahara Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo

Abstract

This study investigates the semiotic meaning in which emojis are used in the comment section of Nas Daily's Instagram posts, an Israeli-Palestinian social media influencer. This study employs Saussure's (1959) theory of semiotics i.e., signifier and signified relationship and Evans's (2017) linguistic theory of emojis, discussing their affective and contextual roles in online communication. A qualitative descriptive design was followed, and data were collected from screenshots of emojis in comments on the Instagram post by Nas Daily on November 26, 2024, about the Nas Scholarship. Data analysis applied Spradley's (1980) four-stage model: Domain Analysis, Taxonomic Analysis, Componential Analysis, and Cultural Theme Analysis. Results show that emojis serve certain communicative functions, where the most frequent functions are Substitution and Reinforcement. The most commonly used emoji sets are People, Symbols, and Smileys. These allow individuals to express emotions, emphasize their messages, or even replace words themselves. The study finds that Instagram users typically use emojis to summarize and reinforce their messages, especially in favorable and supportive settings such as in Nas Daily's comments. Semiotically, emojis are unveiled to be endowed with rich meaning and potent visual means of communication, and using them contributes to social relationships' formation in virtual environments.

References

Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics; Fourth edition. In Вестник Росздравнадзора (Vol. 4, Issue 1). Routledge.

Danesi, M. (2017). The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. Bloomsbury Academic.

Emojipedia. (n.d.). Emojipedia. Available online at: https://emojipedia.org/de/faq/

Evans, V. (2017). The Emoji Code: The Linguistics Behind Smiley Faces and Scaredy Cats. Michael O'Mara Books.

Forceville, C. (2020). Visual Communication. In P. H. van den Hoven, P. van der Slik, & H. Hoeken (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). What We Instagram: A First Analysis of Instagram Photo Content and User Types. Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14578

Manovich, L. (2017). Instagram and contemporary image. http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/instagram-and-contemporary-image

Rachman, F. A. (2024). Emojis on Community Facebook Page ‘Palestine’: A Critical-Semotic Approach.

Saussure, D. F. (1959). Course in General Linguistics. In C. Bally & A. Sechehay (Eds.), Course in General Linguistics. THE PHILOSOPHICAL LIBRARY, INC. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281732

Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Yasa, I. K. D. P. (2020). The Analysis Using Semiotic Theory on Teh Pucuk Harum Advertisement. Jurnal Humanis.

Zappavigna, M., & Logi, L. (2024). How Emoji Make Meaning and Enact Ambient Affiliation: A Social Semiotic Account of Emoji-Text Relations in TikTok Comments. Social Semiotics.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30